Posts Tagged ‘blogging’

Reflections on Policy Progress 2010

Tuesday, December 21st, 2010

This will be the last ‘proper’ post for 2010, although I intend over the next day or so to do two more posts ‘announcing’ further online publications.

It also comes with me having finished (last week) my last post in the ‘Theoretical Foundations’ series, and I am in the process of compiling them into The Power of Ideas: Decline and renewal in the theoretical foundations of progressive thinking.

So it seems appropriate to finish up the year on a reflective note, taking stock of what’s been achieved, and then to say a bit about 2011.

Policy Progress was based on a belief that new policy thinking was important and a bet that this was an opportune time for it. In my very first post, I wrote:

I started Policy Progress because I believe that a clear programme of how we are going to advance as a nation, both economically and socially, is vital for the progressive movement. That programme, in turn, needs to be underpinned by strong theoretical foundations.

. . . I’m not saying there’s a vacuum here at present. Nevertheless, this is an area that always requires ongoing refinement, development and renewal.

Moreover, we’re currently living in turbulent times. Many of the underpinning theories that have dominated policy thinking across the world for the last thirty years are being seriously questioned – particularly in the economic sphere. And the challenge of climate change may require even more fundamental rethinking.

I predict that this will a fertile time for progressive thought. Part of what I aim to do with Policy Progress is to contribute to introducing and adapting these ideas to the New Zealand environment.

That belief and that prediction have continued to inform the 140 posts that I’ve written for Policy Progress over the last eleven months. I’ve traversed a range of different topics and ideas (especially in my Weekend Reading recommendations) and tried a few experiments (Commentary Round-up lasted pretty well; Quote of the Week not so much).

But the two topics that most dominated my work were what I’ve called ‘Progressive Path to Prosperity’ and ‘Theoretical Foundations’. The first related to improving New Zealand’s economic fortunes, and I feel I presented some interesting and original numerical work on understanding the nature of the problem. But there’s certainly still unfinished business to return to there.

Where I feel a real sense of achievement is on ‘Theoretical Foundations’. This topic went right to the heart of what I was talking about in that first post. It tried to grapple with the history and prospects of  progressive thinking and renewal, at a reasonably high level. And the 35 or so posts I produced on that topic really do add up to something that hangs together. There’ll always be more that could have been said on a topic like this, and, of course, new developments happen all the time. But I’m pretty proud of The Power of Ideas and look forward to publishing it online shortly.

In many ways, though, my own work was just the ballast, and the real grace notes on Policy Progress have come in the Guest Posts. Thank you to Darel Hall, Peter Harris, David Craig, Josh Williams, James Caygill, Rob Salmond, Jordan Carter, Ayesha Verrall, Bill Verrall and Donna Wynd. I’m very pleased that two trilogies of posts by Peter Harris and David Craig have been compiled into online publications that will hopefully help them find a wider and ongoing audience (Peter’s one came out last week; David’s should be out shortly). But there is a wealth of other fine guest-posts there, as well.

2010 has also been a learning experience for me at a technical level. I’d been a keen reader of blogs for a few years now (it was RSS readers that really turned me into a convert), so I had some idea what I was letting myself in for. But the ongoing week-to-week experience of producing a blog and keeping it going has been an insightful and at time challenging one. Looking back with hindsight on some of the things I hoped to produce, some of my initial ambition gives me pause (but not regrets). But I’m very pleased that I always gave myself and my readership very clear expectations about what would be produced and how often. I feel that has been the key to maintaining the blog’s momentum.

Thanks too to those who helped get the website off the ground (you know who you are!), and to my Education Directions colleague Dave Guerin who embarked on the blogging adventure in tandem with me.

If this is beginning to sound a bit like a valedictory . . . well, it is, really. I’ll be taking on a new role in the New Year. I can’t say much about it at this time, as the final details haven’t been signed off just yet. But, not only will it involve increased hours and thus reduce my availability for blogging, it will also mean it wouldn’t be appropriate to carry on writing Policy Progress.

So what does that mean for the site? Well, to be honest, we shall have to see. I’ve approached some of my more regular guest-posters about carrying things on without me in 2011, and I’m hopeful that we’ll see Policy Progress entering a new, better and stronger phase. But these people all have jobs and lives of their own, so it may be that the volume of posting reduces a little, or a lot, at least at first. I would anticipate that when new material does go up, though, there’ll still be a newsletter advisory about it, so stay subscribed!

Finally, I’d like to thank you, the readers of Policy Progress. This site has often been more demanding than a standard blog, not just of me, but of the readership as well. Some of the content has been pretty difficult, and the long-running series of posts have often asked a lot of your patience. So thanks for sticking with it, and in particular thanks to those of you who have provided feedback and comment — it really is the fuel that keeps a blogger going!

I won’t be leaving the blogosphere entirely though. I’ll continue to report on my experiences on the Capital & Coast District Health Board on my Care not Cuts website in 2011. In the meantime, here’s wishing you all a pleasant and relaxing Christmas season and a progressive new year!

Regards,

David Choat

Changes at Policy Progress

Thursday, November 4th, 2010

As we’ve started nearing the end of 2010, I’ve been thinking about Policy Progress’s (ahem) progress to date, what’s been achieved, and what else I’d like to get done before the end of the year. And how to manage to do that, taking into account other commitments — including of course my recent election to the Capital & Coast District Health Board.

One thing that I’m very keen to do is to put together some actual reports. I’m thinking PDF-format online publications, and in most case compiling (and possibly re-editing) material that’s been published on the blog, rather than all-new content. (Although, there may be an exception or two to that).

I think that some our writings may find a slightly different audience in that format. And some of it might take on a slightly different character for existing readers, too, when presented all in one place.

My top priority is a report with the (very tentative) working title of Theoretical Foundations: Decline and Renewal in Progressive Thought. This is based on my posts in the Theoretical Foundations category, as foreshadowed here.

But I’d also like to put something together based on my posts about the size and nature of New Zealand’s economic challenge. And I’d like do something with a few of the guest-posts as well.

In order to make some time to get this done, however, I’ve had to take a hard look at the Policy Progress blog and where I can cut back.

First of all, I’ve decided to discontinue ‘Commentary round-up’. I’ve enjoyed tracking Brian Easton, Colin James and Rod Oram each week, and I hope you have too. And, as I said at the beginning, it’s been a good prompt to keep up to date with each of these thoughtful and interesting writers, despite them not being easily RSS-able. But something had to give.

I’m also cutting back on ‘Recommended Reading’. I couldn’t bring myself to discontinue this completely, but I am going to pare it back quite a bit, particularly in terms of description of the articles, at least for now. And I’ll no longer be putting this shortened list up as a post, so you’ll have to subscribe to the Policy Progress newsletter if you want to keep reading my referrals.

Like many of the policy issues that Policy Progress discusses, these changes involve a trade-off, but hopefully as the reports come out you’ll feel that it’s been one worth making.

As always, thanks for reading.

What did you think of the July experiment?

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

We’ve now just about reached the end of our “July experiment”, which halved the number of long posts (“columns”) and instead added a number of shorter ones, and I’m now thinking about what to do in August and beyond.

I’m broadly happy that we’re heading in the right direction, but I think there’s room for a bit of fine-tuning, and I’d value your input. In particular, what do you think of the regular features I’ve added?

Feel free to leave a comment below but I thought I’d also trying making it easy, and hopefully fun, by installing some poll software. Click on your faves and least-faves below!

July Experiment

Wednesday, June 30th, 2010

As subscribers to the Policy Progress e-newsletter already know, I’m trying something a bit different this month.

I’m going to cut back the long-form ‘column’-style posts to once a week, on a Tuesday, and supplement that with some shorter posts.

The guest-posts will stay much the same, but will now be published on a Thursday (subject to availability).

This is an experiment, so let’s see how it works.

Finalised!

Thursday, April 1st, 2010

I’m pleased to be able to say that Policy Progress’s work programme for 2010 has now been finalised.

Undoubtedly, there’ll be some changes as we proceed over the coming year, but the key decisions have now been made.

It’s a good feeling, and I’d like to send out a huge thanks to everyone who commented or wrote in with thoughts and suggestions!

You can see the full work programme here so I’m not going to summarise it in this post.

Instead, I’d like firstly to say a few words about how it has evolved from the draft I published on 2nd March; and secondly to talk about the role that this blog will play as the work programme proceeds.



From Draft to Final

  • The topics that we started with have broadly been retained in the final programme – there seemed to be reasonable support for each of them, and the other suggestions that were put forward seemed to be able to be accommodated within the proposed topics.
  • Child Poverty & Cycles of Disadvantage is now presented more formally as a topic, even though most of the work will take place in 2011 – this responds to calls for a firmer commitment to work on family issues in general and child poverty in particular.
  • In response to strong and persuasive arguments, and despite some initial reservations on my part, Stream 3 of the Progressive Path to Prosperity topic will now look into the issue of a national economic vision and how that might be arrived at.
  • There are now three streams to the Theoretical Foundations topic to emphasise that it will address the rationale for social as well as economic interventions, including what has been described as “How does a progressive government want to interact with society / community – is there a good case for better ’social engineering’?”
  • The Fiscal Record topic has been renamed as suggested in order to emphasise that its purpose is informing the future rather than simply understanding the past.

Finally, I’d like to acknowledge those readers who have made thoughtful comments about the specific economic obstacles I set out last Tuesday. I haven’t responded to those points yet, as my initial focus was on ‘the vision question’ debate, but I’ll reflect on them carefully as work on Stream 2 of the Progressive Path to Prosperity gets underway.

The Role of the Blog
I also wanted to add a few words about how I see this blog operating as the work programme gets underway. Over the next few months, I intend to make a strong start on the work programme topics, and as I do so, I will often post little pieces of work-in-progress here, sometimes to test out some thinking and sometimes just as a point of interest.

I don’t intend to serialise every Policy Progress report in toto on the blog, but you are likely to get a fair idea of many of the key ideas and analysis that will be covered.

In addition, I will also put up little programme-related nuggets like Tuesday’s Martin Wolf graph that I come across and think are worth sharing.

And there will sometimes be posts about other issues entirely. For instance, I see one of the purposes of this blog as celebrating the importance of quality analysis and research in policymaking, and will be looking at ways of doing that – more on that as it develops.

As ever, though, I’m interested in your feedback. What do you think the blog should cover, and how should it best keep everyone informed about progress with the work programme?

About a Blog

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Having welcomed you to the overall site, let me also welcome you to this section of it, the Policy Progress blog.

Once again, there’s a handy About page that you can check out that’ll tell you all about the blog and how it works, so I’ll largely restrict myself to some less formal and more time-bound remarks. I’ll also reiterate a few points about how comments will work.

I don’t think of Policy Progress as a blog, but I do think of this blog as being an important part of Policy Progress. And for probably the next 3-6 months it’ll be the main place where you’ll see a lot of activity. So I want it to work.

To that end, I’ve got three main guidelines that I’m working to.


Under-Promise and Over-Deliver
That’s one mantra I learned from Helen Clark!

We’ve all seen blogs (and other internet projects) that start with a hiss and roar, only to peter out just as dramatically. I’m determined to avoid that.

For the time being, I’m going to stick to a schedule of two posts a week, one on Tuesday morning and another on Thursday morning. Posts will be up by 8.00am. I think having set days and times is useful to those of you who like to check the blog yourself rather than use an RSS feed or wait to be notified by the weekly email newsletter.

I’ve pre-tested this blog a bit, and I know I can’t simply churn out the kind of posts I want to write in a rapid-fire way. I actually think I could probably manage more than two a week, but I’m not certain of that. And I’d rather start modestly and increase over time, than have to pare it back. (And those who know me know I’ve got good, and positive, reasons for not wanting to overcommit myself over the next wee while.)

We’ll also have guest posts, as and when the people who have offered to submit posts start coming through with them. These will be published on a Wednesday (subject to supply).

Listen to Feedback and Be Prepared to Evolve
I’m very interested in what you think of how I’m doing and what I’m writing. I’ve made a commitment to myself that I’ll read and consider carefully the feedback you provide, either in the comments or directly by email (or in person).

Throughout the gestation period for this project, I’ve had a very clear idea about how I intended it to look and work. But I’ve been equally clear that once it went ‘live’ (i.e. now), Policy Progress was bound to evolve in ways I haven’t anticipated. I need to be ready for that and to accept that as a natural process – consistent, of course, with the basic proposition of “a policy ‘think-site’ devoted to developing and supporting progressive initiatives and ideas in Aotearoa-New Zealand”.

A Lively Discussion amongst Progressives
I hope people will be moved to comment by what I write, and I’d like the comments threads to be a valuable sounding-board and source of inspiration for me, and a positive and energising experience for those that participate in them.

But I’m not looking for a free-for-all.

Check out the Comments Policy. It says:

Policy Progress is about contributing to discussion and idea development within the broad left/progressive movement, rather than the debate between left and right.

We take it as a starting point that the progressive path is a better way forward for our country. Our focus therefore is on the most desirable and effective policy programme for the progressive movement to pursue and for a future progressive government to implement.

Readers from other political perspectives are welcome, but we do not intend to turn this into another forum for partisan combats or debates about this week’s political headlines. Those seeking such a forum are already well-served by other blogs.

Comments that are just about running right-wing slogans and attack lines will simply not be published. Even if they’re not particularly nasty. That’s just not the kind of forum this blog is intended to be. (Thoughtful and specific critiques are okay.)

I’m aware that a new and rather niche blog doesn’t necessarily attract heaps of comments, and this policy will reduce the volume further. But I think that’s a price worth paying.

So those are my main guidelines going in, but your feedback is welcome on those as well as on everything else. Tune in on Thursday for our first ‘proper’ post.

Why a ‘Think-Site’?

Tuesday, February 23rd, 2010

Policy Progress is a ‘think-site’ rather than a think-tank or a blog. There’s a bit about this on our About page, but I thought I’d elaborate some more about my reasoning here.

Policy think-tanks are a pretty common feature of the political landscape in other countries, particularly in the United States and the United Kingdom. Some are openly aligned with a political perspective or even a particular party, whereas others seek to be more non-partisan.

The most prominent nonpartisan think-tank in New Zealand is the New Zealand Institute (there are also some university centres that arguably fit the definition) and its main rightwing think-tanks are the Business Roundtable and the (Australasian) Centre for Independent Studies.

But there haven’t been any successful attempts to establish an ongoing think-tank on the left of the political spectrum. I suspect this isn’t an accident. In fact, I think it probably comes down to some pretty fundamental obstacles – to do with finding the funding resources and availability of personnel – that aren’t easy to solve.

So what I’m trying to do with Policy Progress is to work around those obstacles.

At the same time, I also want to to tap into some of the opportunities for online communication and publication that have emerged over the last decade, and that are seen vividly in the proliferation of political blogging in New Zealand, but which haven’t really been exploited much by New Zealand think-tanks.

Part of that comes down to working ‘off the smell of an oily rag’. I’m trying to keep Policy Progress’s overheads very low, and I’m doing this in my ‘free time’ while earning an income from other projects.

Ultimately, if the organisation is going to continue long-term and if I’m going to devote as much time to it as I’d like (and maybe bring others on board), it will need to develop some sort of revenue stream(s). But one step at a time. I thought about spending a lot of time trying to line up sponsors and such like before launching, but in the end I decided it was best to simply leap in and take the ‘Field of Dreams’ approach.

The other thing that I see as distinctive about the ‘think-site’ model is that this blog will be an integral component of Policy Progress’s offerings.

Now, blogging is certainly not an unheard-of feature for regular think-tanks these days. Demos in the UK has a regularly updated blog, while the Centre of American Progress has a thriving blog sister-site, Think Progress. But blogging is likely to make up a larger proportion of activity on the Policy Progress site than would be the case for a regular think-tank.

What’s more, the blog will be interlinked with the think-tank’s overall work programme. Rather than focussing on issues currently in the news, many of its posts foreshadow or test ideas and analysis for its reports. In this way, they form part of the analytical process for Policy Progress’s work programme, as well as being a way to achieve greater awareness about its work.